Graduate students and advisors
Read papers with page-cited answers, build a literature review matrix, draft from reference-only source packages, and run an integrity review before submission.
Start in ChatPDF, where answers about an uploaded paper carry page-cited references back to the document. Reading notes built this way keep every claim attached to the passage it came from, so the thesis evidence base is verifiable from the first day of reading.
Organize verbatim quotes with page and character locators into a source-by-theme matrix. Agreements, conflicts, and gaps across papers become visible before drafting, and every matrix cell stays traceable to the exact passage in the source paper.
Hand selected evidence to Writer Agent as an immutable, reference-only source package — paper fingerprints, page numbers, and character offsets, never full text. The agent drafts against the evidence you chose and marks unsupported claims as needing a source.
Before the thesis leaves your hands, run an integrity review that checks quotations and references against their sources and reports findings with excerpts. Pair the report with your institution's disclosure policy and your advisor's review for a defensible submission record.
No. The workflow keeps authorship with the student: sources stay reference-only, unsupported claims are flagged rather than filled in, and the integrity review documents evidence instead of generating conclusions. Disclosure of AI assistance still follows the institution's policy.
Yes. The matrix shows which sources support which claims, team review states track what has been checked, and integrity review reports give advisors evidence to discuss rather than a score to enforce.
No, it complements them. The integrity review checks citations and quotations against sources; detection remains a separate signal that should be read with context and policy.