Evidence-led document review
Review a complete draft across six connected writing-integrity dimensions, then use passage-level findings and clear evidence limits to decide what needs verification or revision.
Writing Integrity Review turns a document into one evidence-led report across grammar, clarity, style, citation integrity, source transparency, and originality readiness, with explicit limits for responsible follow-up.
Inspect grammar, clarity, style, citation integrity, source transparency, and originality readiness in the same workflow. Findings include the affected passage, an explanation, and a practical revision recommendation.
Use source-transparency and citation findings to locate claims that need clearer attribution or verification. The report works from the submitted document and does not pretend to validate a source it cannot inspect.
This review does not search plagiarism databases or determine whether a person or AI wrote the text. Combine its findings with original sources, draft history, applicable policy, and human judgment.
It checks six connected areas: grammar, clarity, style, citation integrity, source transparency, and originality readiness. The report highlights visible issues and recommends accountable next steps.
No. It does not compare text with plagiarism databases or decide who wrote a document. Use the separate AI Detector for AI-writing risk signals and verify source overlap with an appropriate database when required.
Review each cited passage, verify claims against original sources, compare relevant drafts, and apply your school, publisher, or workplace policy. Treat the report as structured review evidence, not proof of misconduct.