Submitted-draft integrity review
Review a submitted draft of up to 12,000 characters across six connected writing-integrity dimensions, then use text-grounded findings and explicit limits to decide which passages, attributions, and claims need revision or independent source verification.
Writing Integrity Review turns the submitted draft into one structured report across grammar, clarity, style, citation integrity, source transparency, and originality readiness, with explicit limits for responsible follow-up.
Inspect grammar, clarity, style, citation integrity, source transparency, and originality readiness in the same workflow. Findings include the affected passage, an explanation, and a practical revision recommendation.
Use source-transparency and citation findings to locate claims that need clearer attribution or verification. The report works from the submitted document and does not pretend to validate a source it cannot inspect.
This review does not search plagiarism databases or determine whether a person or AI wrote the text. Combine its findings with original sources, draft history, applicable policy, and human judgment.
It checks six connected areas: grammar, clarity, style, citation integrity, source transparency, and originality readiness. The report highlights visible issues and recommends accountable next steps.
No. It does not compare text with plagiarism databases or decide who wrote a document. Use the separate AI Detector for AI-writing risk signals and verify source overlap with an appropriate database when required.
Review each cited passage, verify claims against original sources, compare relevant drafts, and apply your school, publisher, or workplace policy. Treat the report as structured draft-review guidance, not proof of misconduct.