Skip to content
WriteGoAI Writing Assistant
Writer AgentIntegrity ReviewAI DetectorPricing
WriteGoAI Writing Assistant

WriteGo helps writers and teams plan, draft, revise, and review documents, with integrity checks and AI detection available as supporting evidence.

Writing & Integrity Platform

Product

  • Writer Agent
  • Writing Integrity
  • Essay Writer
  • ChatPDF
  • Literature Review Matrix
  • AI Detector
  • AI Humanizer
  • Features
  • ChatGPT Detector
  • Writing Tools
  • Grammar Checker
  • Rewriter
  • Summarizer
  • AI Scholar
  • Paraphrasing Tool
  • Translator
  • Citation Generator
  • Scholar Search
  • Pricing

Resources

  • Blog
  • Resources
  • FAQ
  • Methodology
  • Research
  • How AI Detection Works
  • AI Detector Accuracy
  • AI Detector False Positives
  • Glossary
  • Alternatives
  • Comparisons
  • Reviews

Solutions

  • Solutions
  • Academic Integrity
  • Content Verification
  • Document Types
  • Integrations
  • Help Center
  • About Us
  • Contact

Legal

  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

© 2026 WriteGo. All rights reserved.

AI writing and integrity review.

    Editorial standards

    How WriteGo reviews and maintains published content

    This policy explains who owns WriteGo's published content, how it is reviewed, how AI assistance is handled, and how corrections and AI-detector claims are governed.

    Publication accountability

    Publisher
    WriteGo (organization)
    Editorial responsibility
    WriteGo is accountable for page-level editorial decisions. A named author or reviewer is shown only when that identity and role can be verified.
    Content covered
    Marketing pages, product and tool guidance, help content, research and methodology pages, comparisons, and glossary entries published on writego.ai.
    Policy last reviewed
    July 15, 2026

    Review and publication process

    Pages should describe the current product and give readers enough context to evaluate the information. Review depth is proportional to the consequence of the claim.

    • A page begins with a defined reader need and a check against the product, policy, or methodology it describes.
    • Before publication, a WriteGo reviewer checks clarity, internal consistency, working link targets, and alignment with the current user experience.
    • Material external factual claims are checked against accessible primary sources when available. A citation must support the exact statement, date, and qualifier attached to it.
    • Uncertain or incomplete evidence is presented with limitations; publication does not turn probability into certainty.

    AI assistance and source verification

    AI tools may support editorial work, but generated text is not treated as evidence and does not replace accountable review.

    • AI may assist with outlines, translation drafts, proofreading, summarization, or alternative phrasing.
    • Source titles, quotations, numbers, links, product capabilities, and material conclusions must be checked before publication.
    • Content must not use fabricated citations, fictional experts, or credentials that cannot be substantiated.
    • When a source cannot be verified, the claim should be removed, narrowed, or clearly labeled as unconfirmed.

    AI-detector claim policy

    WriteGo describes detector output as review evidence rather than proof of authorship. A score should be interpreted with the document, writing history, and applicable policy.

    • We do not present a detector score as a conclusive accusation or recommend using it as the sole basis for a high-stakes decision.
    • A performance claim should identify its evaluation scope, including relevant dataset composition, language or domain, product or model version, test date, metrics, and limitations.
    • Numerical accuracy claims should not be published without auditable supporting material that explains how the result was obtained.
    • Pages distinguish capabilities that are available from features that are beta, limited, planned, or documented as examples.

    Review cadence and material updates

    Content is reviewed when a product capability, policy, methodology, cited source, or material claim changes. Higher-consequence pages receive priority. A substantive review or correction should update the page's visible review date; minor spelling or formatting changes may not.

    Policy last reviewed: July 15, 2026

    Corrections and feedback

    WriteGo evaluates reported issues against the current product, policy, and available sources. Material errors should be corrected or removed, and uncertainty should be made explicit when the evidence remains incomplete.

    To report an issue, include the page URL, the statement in question, why it may be inaccurate, and any supporting source.

    Email the WriteGo team: [email protected]

    Related trust information

    AI detection methodologyPrivacy policyContact WriteGo