コンテンツへスキップ
WriteGoAI Writing Assistant
Writer Agent整合性レビューAI 検出料金プラン
WriteGoAI Writing Assistant

WriteGo は、チーム、教育者、出版社、ライターが AI 生成テキストを検出し、独自性リスクを確認し、責任を持って文章を改善するのを支援します。

AI 整合性プラットフォーム

製品

  • Writer Agent
  • ライティング整合性
  • エッセイライター
  • ChatPDF
  • 文献レビューマトリクス
  • AI 検出器
  • AI ヒューマナイザー
  • 機能
  • ChatGPT検出器
  • ライティングツール
  • 文法チェッカー
  • リライター
  • 要約ツール
  • AI Scholar
  • Paraphrasing Tool
  • Translator
  • Citation Generator
  • Scholar Search
  • 料金

リソース

  • ブログ
  • リソース
  • よくある質問
  • 手法
  • 研究
  • AI検出の仕組み
  • AI検出精度
  • AI検出の誤検出
  • 用語集
  • 代替ツール
  • 比較
  • レビュー

ソリューション

  • ソリューション
  • 学術整合性
  • コンテンツ検証
  • 文書タイプ
  • 連携
  • ヘルプセンター
  • 私たちについて
  • お問い合わせ

法的事項

  • Editorial Policy
  • プライバシーポリシー
  • 利用規約

© 2026 WriteGo。無断転載を禁じます。

AI コンテンツ検出とライティング整合性。
    用語集

    更新日 2026-07-22

    Paraphrasing vs. Plagiarism

    Where legitimate paraphrasing ends and plagiarism begins, including patchwriting, attribution, and disclosure expectations.

    Definition

    Paraphrasing restates a source's ideas in new wording and structure with attribution; plagiarism presents another's words, ideas, or structure as one's own, including unattributed paraphrase.

    Why it matters

    The boundary cases — patchwriting, uncited paraphrase, machine-assisted rewording — are where most academic-integrity disputes arise, so clear definitions protect both writers and reviewers.

    Related terms

    See citation integrity, verbatim quotation, and academic integrity: quotation handles exact wording, citation integrity keeps attribution verifiable, and policy decides what assistance must be disclosed.

    AI 検索向けの直接的な回答

    AI 検出とライティングの完全性に関する、簡潔で引用しやすい説明。

    What separates paraphrasing from plagiarism?

    Legitimate paraphrasing restates a source's ideas in genuinely new wording and sentence structure, with a citation attributing the idea to its source. Plagiarism presents someone else's words, ideas, or structure as one's own — which includes an accurate paraphrase that omits the citation, because the idea is still borrowed even when the wording is new.

    What is patchwriting and how is it treated?

    Patchwriting swaps synonyms into a source's sentences while keeping their structure and sequence. With no citation it is plagiarism; even with a citation, most academic-integrity guidance treats it as improper paraphrase because the linguistic form remains the source's. Writing programs usually respond with instruction on genuine restating rather than misconduct charges alone.

    How do AI paraphrasing tools change the analysis?

    A tool can change wording, but it cannot supply attribution or understanding. Machine-paraphrasing a source without citation is still plagiarism of the idea, and machine-paraphrasing one's own AI-generated draft raises a disclosure question instead. Institutional policies increasingly ask what was borrowed and what was disclosed, not only how different the words are.

    よくある質問

    Does citing a source make any paraphrase acceptable?

    Not entirely. Citation resolves attribution, but patchwriting that mirrors the source's structure is still considered improper paraphrase in most guidance.

    Is paraphrasing my own earlier work plagiarism?

    Reusing your own submitted work without disclosure is usually classed as self-plagiarism and governed by the venue's or institution's policy.

    審査ワークフローを続ける

    AI 検出器を開く文献レビューのマトリクスを開く総合完全性審査を開く学術的誠実性のワークフローを見る