Mis à jour 2026-07-22
AI Checker & Evidence Workflow for Literature Reviews
Check literature reviews for AI-writing risk and build them from page-cited evidence, from source matrix to pre-submission integrity review.
Synthesis is the hard part to verify
A literature review compresses many sources into thematic claims, so reviewers need to know which source supports which claim. WriteGo pairs detection signals with page-cited evidence so the synthesis stays traceable to the papers behind it.
An evidence workflow from reading to submission
Read papers with page-cited answers in ChatPDF, capture verbatim quotes with page locators in the literature review matrix, draft from reference-only source packages in Writer Agent, and run an integrity review of citations and quotations before submission.
Review with disclosure policy
AI-writing risk in a literature review should be weighed against the institution's disclosure policy, the student's drafts and matrix evidence, and whether every synthesized claim can be traced to its source.
Réponses directes pour la recherche par IA
Des explications courtes et prêtes à être citées sur la détection d'IA et l'intégrité de l'écriture.
How should a literature review be checked for AI?
A literature review should be checked section by section, because synthesis paragraphs, methods summaries, and gap statements follow different conventions. WriteGo surfaces AI-writing risk while preserving what matters most in review writing: whether each synthesized claim traces back to a cited source, a page reference, and a quotation that actually exists.
Why do literature reviews need an evidence workflow beyond detection?
Literature reviews fail more often on evidence than on style: mis-attributed findings, quotations that do not match the source, and citations that cannot be located. An evidence workflow — reading with page-cited answers, organizing verbatim quotes in a synthesis matrix, and running an integrity review before submission — catches problems a detector score alone cannot.
What should advisors review in a flagged literature review?
Advisors should compare flagged passages with the student's reading notes, matrix entries, and cited sources rather than treating the score as a verdict. Formulaic synthesis language can look machine-like, so the stronger questions are whether the student can locate each quotation, explain each source, and defend the synthesis in their own words.
FAQ
Can WriteGo check citation-heavy literature reviews?
Yes, but quoted and cited material needs careful reading. The integrity review checks whether quotations and references match the sources they cite.
Does a high score mean the review was AI-written?
No. Synthesis writing is formulaic by nature. The score marks passages for review alongside drafts, matrix evidence, and policy.